TNDMS - The National Diabetes Management Strategy
You are using a browser that is not standards-compliant (possibly Netscape 4). The information on this Web site will be accessible to you, but for a list of Web browsers that comply with the World Wide Web Consortium standards, please visit our Web standards page.

Research Studies ...

DEFINE Program - Resources & Publications

 

DEFINE specific publications and presentations

Other resources and publications

 


DEFINE Specific Publications and Presentations

Publications - Articles in Peer-Reviewed Journals

Harris, Stewart B.; Paquette-Warren, Jann.  Investments in Diabetes Strategies: Time to Evaluate! Canadian Journal of Diabetes, Jun 38(3):159-160, 2014.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.02.029

Paquette-Warren, Jann; Naqshbandi Hayward, Mariam; Tompkins, Jordan W.; Harris, Stewart B.  Time to Evaluate Diabetes and Guide Health Research and Policy Innovation: The Diabetes Evaluation Framework (DEFINE).  The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 29(2):1-10, 2014. https://evaluationcanada.ca/system/files/cjpe-entries/29-2-001.pdf

Paquette-Warren, Jann; Harris, Stewart B; Naqshbandi Hayward, Mariam; Tompkins, Jordan W. (2016) Case study evaluations that go beyond clinical outcomes to assess quality improvement diabetes programmes using the Diabetes Evaluation Framework for Innovative National Evaluations (DEFINE). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 22(5), 644-652. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.12510/abstract

Paquette-Warren, Jann; Tyler, Marie; Fournie, Meghan; Harris, Stewart B (2017) The Diabetes Evaluation Framework for Innovative National Evaluations (DEFINE): construct and content validation using a modified Delphi method. Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 41(3), June 2017, 281-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.10.011

Invited Presentations at Professional Meetings

Harris, Stewart B.; Paquette-Warren, Jann.  Guide to Improve the Assessment of Diabetes Evaluation Framework for Innovation National Evaluations (DEFINE).  Invited presentation at Symposium entitled Improving Diabetes Care and Outcomes: Assessing the Impact of Diabetes Investments in Canada, 17th Annual CDA/CSEM Professional Conference and Annual Meetings, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, October 23, 2014.

Harris, Stewart B.; Paquette-Warren, Jann.  Diabetes Evaluation Framework for Innovative National Evaluations DEFINE … A Canadian National Diabetes Management Strategy Initiative.  Invited presentation at Primary Health Care Research Forum, Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, June 11, 2014.

Abstracts and Professional Presentations

Harris, Stewart B.; Paquette-Warren, Jann. Modified Delphi Process to Refine and Validate a Diabetes Evaluation Framework.  Abstract presented at North American Primary Care Research Group (NAPCRG), 42nd Annual Meeting, New York, USA, November 23, 2014.  

Harris, Stewart; Paquette-Warren, Jann; Naqshbandi Hayward, Mariam; Tompkins, Jordan.  Time to Evaluate Diabetes Strategies: The Diabetes Evaluation Framework (DEFINE).  Abstract presented at North American Primary Care Research Group (NAPCRG), 41stth Annual Meeting, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, November 11, 2013.

Invited Presentations – Key Stakeholders

Harris, Stewart B.; Paquette-Warren, Jann. Diabetes Evaluation Framework for Innovative National Evaluations. Presentation at the Primary Health Care Research Forum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 11, 2014.

Harris, Stewart B.; Paquette-Warren, Jann. Diabetes Evaluation Framework for Innovative National Evaluations. Presentation to Sanofi Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, January 22, 2014.

Harris, Stewart B.; Paquette-Warren, Jann. Diabetes Evaluation Framework for Innovative National Evaluations. Presentation to the Senior Director, System Design & Integration and Team at the South West Local Integrated Health Network , London, Ontario, Canada, January 29, 2014.

Harris, Stewart B.; Paquette-Warren, Jann. Diabetes Evaluation Framework for Innovative National Evaluations. Presentation to the Associate Deputy Minister, Policy and Transformation and Team at the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, January 9, 2014.

Harris, Stewart B.; Paquette-Warren, Jann. Diabetes Evaluation Framework for Innovative National Evaluations. Presentation at the Evaluation of Health Systems Meeting, St. Joseph’s Health Care , London, Ontario, Canada, October 23, 2013.

back to top

Other Resources and Publications

References

Australia National Quality Council. (2009). Guide for developing assessment tools 2009. Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from http://www.nssc.natese.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/51023/Validation_and_Moderation_-_Guide_for_developing_assessment_tools.pdf

Baker, G. R. (2011). The contribution of case study research to knowledge of how to improve quality of care. BMJ Quality and Safety, 20(SUPPL. 1), i30-i35. Retrieved from http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/20/Suppl_1/i30.full.pdf+html

Bamberger, M., Rao, V., & Woolcock, M. (2010). Using mixed methods in monitoring and evaluation. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Mixed methods in social & behavioural research(2nd ed., pp. 613-641). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Barr, V. J., Robinson, S., Marin-Link, B., Underhill, L., Dotts, A., Ravensdale, D., & Salivaras, S. (2003). The expanded chronic care model: An integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the chronic care model. Hospital Quarterly, 7(1), 73-82. Retrieved from http://www.primaryhealthcarebc.ca/pdf/eccm_article.pdf

Birch, S., & Maynard, A. (1986). Performance indicators and performance assessment in the UK national health service: Implications for management and planning. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 1(2), 143-156. doi:10.1002/hpm.4740010206

Blalock, A. B. (1999). Evaluation research and the performance management movement: From estrangement to useful integration? Evaluation, 5(2), 117-149.  Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0009088148&partnerID=40&md5=643ab69e121f295aad8e45c6e3d45bd7

Borgermans, L. A., Goderis, G., Ouwens, M., Wens, J., Heyrman, J., & Grol, R. P. (2008). Diversity in diabetes care programmes and views on high quality diabetes care: Are we in need of a standardized framework? International Journal of Integrated Care, 8, 1-15. Retrieved from http://www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/URN%3ANBN%3ANL%3AUI%3A10-1-100478/471

Bowen, S. (2012). A guide to evaluation in health research. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Retrieved from http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/kt_lm_guide_evhr-en.pdf

Bryson, J. M., Patton, M. Q., & Bowman, R. A. (2011). Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1), 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.07.001

Canadian Diabetes Association. (2011). Diabetes: Canada at the tipping point. Toronto: Canadian Diabetes Association. Retrieved from http://www.diabetes.ca/documents/get-involved/WEB_Eng.CDA_Report_.pdf

Canadian Institute for Health Information. (2011a). Health indicators 2011. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information. Retrieved from https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/health_indicators_2011_en.pdf

Canadian Institute for Health Information. (2011b). Learning from the best: Benchmarking Canada's health system. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information. Retrieved from https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/learning_from_thebest_en.pdf

Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2010). A guide to knowledge synthesis: A knowledge synthesis chapter. Retrieved from http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/41382.html

Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2012). Guide to knowledge translation planning at CIHR: Integrated and end-of-grant approaches. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Information. Retrieved from http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/45321.html

back to top

Chaudoir, S. R., Dugan, A. G., & Barr, C. H. I. (2013). Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: A systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implementation Science, 8(1), 1-20. Retrieved from http://www.implementationscience.com/content/pdf/1748-5908-8-22.pdf

Chen, H. (2005). Practical program evaluation: Assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cooksy, L. J., Gill, P., & Kelly, P. A. (2001). The program logic model as an integrative framework for a multimethod evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24(2), 119-128. doi:10.1016/S0149-7189(01)00003-9

Crabtree, B. F., Chase, S. M., Wise, C. G., Schiff, G. D., Schmidt, L. A., Goyzueta, J. R., . . . Jaen, C. R. (2011). Evaluation of patient centered medical home practice transformation initiatives. Medical Care, 49(1), 10-16. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f80766

Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2013). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new medical research council guidance. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50(5), 587-592. doi:  10.1136/bmj.a1655

Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Smith KC for the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, National Institutes of Health.Retrieved from http://obssr.od.nih.gov/scientific_areas/methodology/mixed_methods_research/index.aspx

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd  ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

Dehar, M. A., Casswell, S., & Duignan, P. (1993). Formative and process evaluation of health promotion and disease prevention programs. Evaluation Review, 17(2), 204-220. Retrieved from http://erx.sagepub.com/content/17/2/204.full.pdf+html

Devers, K. J. (2011). Qualitative methods in health services and management research: Pockets of excellence and progress, but still a long way to go. Medical Care Research and Review: MCRR, 68(1), 41-48. doi:10.1177/1077558710384269

Dubois, N., Lloyd, S., Houle, J., Mercier, C., Brousselle, A., & Rey, L. (2011). Discussion: Practice-based evaluation as a response to address intervention complexity. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 26(3), 105-113. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1038939197?accountid=15115

Gallivan, J., Greenberg, R., & Brown, C. (2008). The national diabetes education program evaluation framework: How to design an evaluation of a multifaceted public health education program. Prev Chronic Dis, 5(4). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2008/oct/07_0191.htm

Harris, S., Paquette-Warren, J., Roberts, S., Fournie, M., Thind, A., Ryan, B. L., . . . Webster-Bogaert, S. (2013). Results of a mixed-methods evaluation of partnerships for health: A quality improvement initiative for diabetes care. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: JABFM, 26(6), 711-719. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jabfm.org/content/26/6/711.full.pdf+html

Harris, S. B., & Paquette-Warren, J. (2014). Investments in diabetes strategies: Time to evaluate! Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 38(3), 159-160. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.02.029

Harris, S. B., Green, M. E., Brown, J. B., Roberts, S., Russell, G., Fournie, M., . . . Birtwhistle, R. Impact of a quality improvement program on primary healthcare in Canada: A mixed-method evaluation. Health Policy. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.10.019

Hogg, W., Rowan, M., Russell, G., Geneau, R., & Muldoon, L. (2008). Framework for primary care organizations: The importance of a structural domain. International Journal for Quality in Health Care: Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care / ISQua, 20(5), 308-313. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm054

Hulscher, M. E., Laurant, M. G., & Grol, R. P. (2003). Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 12(1), 40-46. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1743654/pdf/v012p00040.pdf
International Diabetes Federation. (2011). IDF Diabetes Atlas, 2011. Fourth edition. Retrieved from http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/5e/the-global-burden.

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1743654/pdf/v012p00040.pdf

Kelley, E. T., Arispe, I., & Holmes, J. (2006). Beyond the initial indicators: Lessons from the OECD health care quality indicators project and the US national healthcare quality report. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 18(SUPPL. 1), 45-51. Retrieved from http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/intqhc/18/suppl_1/45.full.pdf

Khan, L., Mincemoyer, S., & Gabbay, R. A. (2009). Diabetes registries: Where we are and where are we headed? Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 11(4), 255-262. doi:10.1089/dia.2008.0057

Mathison, S., & American Evaluation Association. (2005). Encyclopedia of evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

McEwan, K. L., & Bigelow, D. A. (1996). Using a logic model to focus health services on population health goals. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 11(2), 167-174. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1011302333?accountid=15115

McLoughlin, V., Leatherman, S., Fletcher, M., & Owen, J. W. (2001). Improving performance using indicators. recent experiences in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. International Journal for Quality in Health Care: Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care / ISQua, 13(6), 455-462. Retrieved from http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/intqhc/13/6/455.full.pdf

Nasmith L., Ballem P., Baxter R., Bergman H., Colin-Thomé D., Herbert C., Keating N., Lessard R., Lyons R., McMurchy D., Ratner P., Rosenbaum P., Tamblyn R., Wagner E.,& Zimmerman B. (2010). Transforming care for Canadians with chronic health conditions: Put people first, expect the best, manage for results. Ottawa:Canadian Academy of Health Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.cahs-acss.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/cdm-final-English.pdf

O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2010). Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. British Medical Journal, 341,c4587. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4587

OECD. (2011). Health at a glance 2011: OECD indicatorsOECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2011-en

Office of the Auditor General of Canada. (2013). 2013 spring report of the Auditor General of Canada.  Ottawa: Office of the Auditor General of Canada. Retrieved from http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_201304_05_e_38190.html

Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. (2007). Preventing and managing chronic disease: Ontario's framework. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Retrieved from http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/cdpm/pdf/framework_full.pdf

Paquette-Warren, J., Naqshbandi Hayward, M., Tompkins, J., & Harris, S. (2014). Time to evaluate diabetes and guide health research and policy innovation: The diabetes evaluation framework (DEFINE). The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 29(2), 1-20. doi: 10.3138/cjpe.29.2.1

Paquette-Warren, J., Roberts, S. E., Fournie, M., Tyler, M., Brown, J., & Harris, S. (2014). Improving chronic care through continuing education of interprofessional primary healthcare teams: A process evaluation. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(3), 232-238. Retrieved from http://informahealthcare.com/doi/pdfplus/10.3109/13561820.2013.874981

Patton, M. Q. (1994). Developmental evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 311-319. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633(94)90026-4

Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research: Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioural science. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa514

Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: Guilford Press.

Public Health Agency of Canada. (2011a). Diabetes in Canada: Facts and figures from a public health perspective. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada. Retrieved from http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cd-mc/publications/diabetes-diabete/facts-figures-faits-chiffres-2011/pdf/facts-figures-faits-chiffres-eng.pdf

Public Health Agency of Canada. (2011b). United Nations NCD summit 2011.  Chronic diseases - most significant cause of death globally. Retrieved from http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/media/nr-rp/2011/2011_0919-bg-di-eng.php

Public Health Agency of Canada. (2012). Knowledge translation (KT) planning primer. Ottawa, Canada: Public Health Agency of Canada.

Retrieved from http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2013/aspc-phac/HP35-37-2012-eng.pdf

Public Health Agency of Canada. (2014). Policy & program planning, implementation & evaluation. Retrieved from http://cbpp-pcpe.phac-aspc.gc.ca/resources/public-health-competencies-information-tools/policy-program-planning-implementation-evaluation/

Song M.K., Sandelowski M., & Happ M.B. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in conducting mixed methods intervention studies in health sciences. In Tashakkori A., & Teddlie C. (Eds.), Mixed methods in social & behavioural research (2nd ed., pp. 725-747). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Tashakkori A., & Teddlie C. (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

The Canadian Evaluation Society. (2014). Competencies for Canadian evaluators. Retrieved November from http://www.evaluationcanada.ca/competencies-canadian-evaluators

Vingilis, E., & Pederson, L. (2001). Using the right tools to answer the right questions: The importance of evaluative research techniques for health services evaluation research in the 21st century. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 16(2), 1-26. Retrieved from http://www.evaluationcanada.ca/secure/16-2-001.pdf

W.K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004a). W. K. Kellogg foundation evaluation handbook. Retrieved from http://www.wkkf.org/resource-directory/resource/2010/w-k-kellogg-foundation-evaluation-handbook

W.K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004b). W.K. Kellogg foundation logic model development guide. Retrieved from http://www.wkkf.org/resource-directory/resource/2006/02/wk-kellogg-foundation-logic-model-development-guide

Wagner, E. H., Glasgow, R. E., Davis, C., Bonomi, A. E., Provost, L., McCulloch, D., . . . Sixta, C. (2001). Quality improvement in chronic illness care: A collaborative approach. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 27(2), 63-80.  

Weiner, B. J., Amick, H. R., Lund, J. L., Lee, S. Y., & Hoff, T. J. (2011). Use of qualitative methods in published health services and management research: A 10-year review. Medical Care Research and Review: MCRR, 68(1), 3-33. doi:10.1177/1077558710372810

World Health Organization. (2006). Quality of care: A process for making strategic choices in health systems. Geneva:World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/management/quality/assurance/QualityCare_B.Def.pdf

World Health Organization. (2008). World health statistics 2008. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/EN_WHS08_Full.pdf?ua=1

World Health Organization. (2010). Monitoring the building blocks of health systems: A handbook of indicators and their measurement strategies. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/healthinfo/systems/WHO_MBHSS_2010_full_web.pdf

Zhang, W., & Cresswell, J. (2012). The use of “Mixing” procedure of mixed methods in health services research. Medical Care, 51 (8): e51-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31824642fd

 

back to top